Texas is suing OpenAI and Sam Altman to keep ChatGPT away from minors
The short answer
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman on 23 October 2026, arguing that ChatGPT was marketed as safe while the company failed to protect minors. The state wants the court to bar ChatGPT from being offered to minors in Texas until age verification and parental controls exist.
What was filed
The petition names OpenAI Global, its affiliates, and Sam Altman personally. The core claim is not that the model is bad at answering questions. It is that OpenAI marketed a consumer product as safe and reliable while the risks were not disclosed, and that the company built no meaningful way for a parent to control or verify a minor's use.
The state brings claims under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, and under the SCOPE Act, a Texas law that puts obligations on platforms used by minors. The requested relief is the part worth reading closely: an order restricting ChatGPT's availability to minors in Texas until age verification and parental controls are in place, plus costs and fees.
The numbers in the complaint
The filing states that ChatGPT has millions of users in Texas, including thousands in Collin County and tens of thousands under the age of 13. It also points to individual cases, including the death of a Texas teenager in 2025 and a shooting in which a gunman had used the product.
Those examples are doing the work in the document. A case built on a product being unsafe is hard to litigate. A case built on specific people is easier to argue in front of a jury and easier to explain to a legislature.
Why this matters beyond Texas
Two things. First, if a state can restrict a consumer AI product by age, the compliance work lands on every company shipping a chatbot, not just OpenAI. Age verification is the expensive part, and it changes the signup flow everyone uses.
Second, the personal naming of the CEO is a signal. It makes the case about decisions, not just a product, which is the same argument states have used against tobacco and social media.
For teams building on these models, the practical read is simple: assume the consumer-facing side gets stricter, and keep your own product's age gates and disclosures ahead of that curve rather than behind it.
Questions people ask
Is ChatGPT banned in Texas?
No. This is a lawsuit, not a ban. The state is asking a court to order restrictions on minors until verification and parental controls exist.
What laws are cited?
The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, and the SCOPE Act.
What happens next?
The case goes to a Texas district court. Expect OpenAI to argue that the harms described are not caused by the product, and that age verification is a policy question for legislators.
Read next: OpenAI stops training on the live internet and what to give an AI agent, and what to withhold.